Archive for March, 2011
Do you feel like your working at the bottom of the privy, and someone didn’t see the sign, “workman below.”
The Senate liberals are planning an attack on those in Congress who want to bring sanity back to spending. Their plan is to label all those who want cuts as extremists. Let’ see now…spending within your budget is extreme? Living within your means..extreme?
Only liberal lap dogs of the spend-the-country-into-third-world-status would think so.
We have a president whose father sired 8 kids by four different wives and supported none of them, and who said in Dreams of my Father how he looked up to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. Is that where this kind of mentality comes from? Total lack of responsibility? Obvious disregard for consequence? Trust me, I’m not one to paint someone with the same brush as his father, as I was raised without mine…but I sure as hell didn’t shout from a publisher’s pulpit about how wonderful he was, how sweet the silence of his absence. Not only did I not write about it, I didn’t talk about it.
Mr. President, someone in Washington D.C. has to come to their senses, and you haven’t demonstrated a whisper of economic common sense, a smidgen of responsibility, an iota of regard for future generations.
I’m beginning to believe that liberals are either mentally deficient or mentally disturbed. What other answer could there be to this spend, spend, spend mentality? And where, exactly, are the so-called conservatives? I think they all truly believe that as long as the government has ink and paper to print money that they can go on spending. That’s the “I still have checks in my checkbook” simple minded, and very destructive, thinking of mental midgets. Try it down on Main Street, and you’ll end up in the hoosegow, and rightfully so. It would be fine with me if congressmen and women merely messed their own nests, but they’re in a position to mess yours and mine, I should say to continue to mess yours and mine, and I’m tried of being crapped on by those who are supposed to be looking out for you, and me, and your children and grandchildren and mine, and the country. YOUR COUNTRY AND MINE!
How long do they think we can have $1,000,000,000,000,000.00 (that’s a trillion, A trillion seconds is 31,688 years, FYI) dollar deficits per annum, on top of an accumulated $14,000,000,000,000,000.00, (that’s 14 trillion) before all we can do is trade commodity for commodity on the international marketplace. Let’ see, I’ll give you 40 bushels of wheat for your 1 barrel of oil. That’s what it’s going to come to if Congress doesn’t stop the insanity. We have already lost our position in the world’s eyes; the “full faith and credit” of the United States of America means little in the world.
Already the dollar is plummeting against other world currencies. Already it’s being shunned as the world’s reserve currency, and rightfully so, when our Congressmen and Senators continue to refuse to cut the size of government, their freewheeling spending, their wonton disregard for simple economics. Come’on, ladies and gentlemen, get off this path of destruction. You’re destroying our country.
YOU CAN’T SPEND WHAT YOU DON’T HAVE! I’m getting damn tired of asking nicely.
This came to me via the web, so I have no way to know if it’s properly attributed. It’s been around several times in several formats, however, it’s worth reading:
YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS:
Obama Care Details by Page Number
ObamaCare Bill HB3200:
THIS IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL
Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX- HB3200 highlighted pages most egregious. Please read this…….. especially the reference to pages 58 & 59.
JUDGE KITHIL wrote:
Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.
Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual’s bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.
Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now – ACORN).
Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)
Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors’ fees.
Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient’s age.
Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.
Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an “end-of-life planning” seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)
Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.
HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on:
“Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress are already exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded private plan that covers their retirement needs. If they were on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick ‘fix’ to make the plan financially sound for their future.”
Honorable David Kithil
Marble Falls, Texas
“When a legislature decides to steal some of our rights and plans to use police force to accomplish it, what’s the real difference between them and the thief? Darn little! They hide behind the excuse that they’re legislating democratically. The fact they do it by a majority vote has no moral significance whatsoever. Numerical might does not constitute right, no more than a lynch mob can justify its act because a majority participated.” – H. L. Richardson
[Hubert Leon "Bill" Richardson] California state senator (1966-1988), author, Founder and Chairman of Gun Owners of America
“The purpose of the Bill of Rights was to limit what the federal government could do. Any interpretation of a provision of the Bill of Rights as a grant of federal power is ipso facto wrong.” – L. A. Powe, Jr. Centennial Professor of Law at The University of Texas
Source: Guns, Words, And Constitutional Interpretation, 38 William & Mary L. R. 1311, 1341-42 (1997).