Does the term “sneak thief” work here?


Why not fund those who intimidate voters, a crime I think should be made a severely punished felony…what’s more important to our republic and way of life, than the poll booth?

This from visiontoamerica.org:

Why is President Obama apparently defying federal law by funding ACORN?

Judicial Watch discovered that the Obama administration is flouting the will of Congress by giving federal taxpayer money to ACORN.

Obama’s Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) gave a $79,819 grant to the largest branch of the ACORN tree, ACORN Housing Corp. (AHC). AHC filed papers last year legally changing its name to Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA). It’s the same old organization with a brand new ACORN-free name.

Worse yet, the grant funds a political agitation and indoctrination program. Here’s HUD’s euphemistic description of the program:

Education and Outreach Initiative grants (EOI) – HUD awarded $6.8 million to organizations that educate the public and housing providers about their rights and obligations under federal, state, and local fair housing laws. Groups will also conduct fair lending workshops, community meetings, and individual counseling activities focused on homeowners at risk for discrimination.

According to HUD, the grant money came out of fiscal 2010 appropriations. That’s a big problem.

Post Continues on spectator.org

Read more: Obama Gives New Grant to ACORN, Violating Federal Law | Vision to America http://visiontoamerica.org/2057/obama-gives-new-grant-to-acorn-violating-federal-law/#ixzz1QxQAPzFg

 

One Response to “Does the term “sneak thief” work here?”

Leave a Reply