The Plot Thickens….

Came to me on the web….

An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose

Social Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama:   Jean
Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United
States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama’s current SSN)
in or about March 1977.

Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut.  Because of that,
his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few
reserved for Connecticut residents.

Obama never lived or worked in that state!  Therefore, there is no
reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042.  None
whatsoever!

Now comes the best part!  Ludwig spent the final months of his life in
Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked
part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and
therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s
death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there
were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not
a U.S. citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became acitizen
of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the
probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving
Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwigs Connecticut SSN for
Obama.

Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and onto the
issue of Barry O’s use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads
exploding, because they will have no way of defending Obama.

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term
“natural born” there are few who do not understand that if you are
using someone else’s SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.

20 Responses to “The Plot Thickens….”

  • tellerIP:

    The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

    Millions of people have multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

    http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html

    You might well ask why, if there is evidence that Obama has multiple SS numbers and that one of them came from Connecticut that NO committee in Congress wants to investigate? Why not?

    Because it is not illegal to have mistakes in your SS files, and lots of people do.

    • The question is not if it’s illegal to possess a false social security number, but is it illegal to knowingly use a false social security number. I don’t know the answer to that, but can’t imagine it’s not. How wise do you have to be to know that everyone you grew up with had a number starting with 9 and yours starts with “O”. If we can’t question his intent, we can certainly question his intelligence.

  • tellerIP:

    Where is there ANY proof that Obama ever used more than one SS number?

    As for the SS number itself and this comment “we can certainly question his intellige.”

    You clearly read that the ZIP in Hawaii was 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. 06814. Those are not the SS numbers. They are the zip codes that generated the SS numbers.

    The fact that all the digits are the same except for the first digit make it clear that a typo of some kind generated the CT SS number. Either the clerk misread the first digit or hit the wrong key. And the fact that there are millions of errors in the ss files makes this highly likely.

    As for Obama not questioning the SS number. I have never met anyone who questioned her or his SS number.

    You did not answer this: “NO committee in Congress wants to investigate? Why not?”

    Is the answer that they are all traitors? Or, isn’t it far more likely that they all know that there are millions of mistakes in the SS files and that the CT SS number was caused by a data entry error?

    • You’re right, they are, of course, ZIP numbers, that generate far different SS numbers. I have used an SS number for 54 years, and I have questioned, not mine, but others, and where they originated, not for any reason other than curiosity. No, no committee in congress has investigated to the best of my knowledge, nor have they questioned his birth certificate, nor his entrance applications to any university, nor his grades, nor how he financed a very expensive education, even though he refused to make any of it public. That’s not the first time congress has displayed its cowardice in the last two decades. He did make his birth certificate public, which I tore apart on Photoshop within 15 minutes, and I’m no expert. There has still been no response to the thousands of nerds, far better at it than me, who took it apart and destroyed any claim that it had not been tampered with. You may be mesmerized by his charm, but I’m not, it’s only substance I’m looking for. I don’t care what public office a man or woman seeks, their background should be an open book. I grow very suspicious of any who think they should take office without being open and aboveboard.

  • tellerIP:

    I have used a social security number for considerably more than 54 years, and I have never questioned it. It was automatically generated. It was give to me, and it is mine.

    I see no reason why I should have checked it. Still, the facts are that millions of people have multiple ss numbers in their files, and sometimes the same SS number is issued to multiple people:

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

    http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html

    The similarity of the CT and HI zip codes make it pretty obvious that a data entry error, either misreading the first digit or entering it wrong, lead to the generation of the CT social security number for Obama. There are also other numbers in his file, but there is no evidence that he used more than one of them.

    As for Obama being able to finance a very expensive education. Yes, that is done by academic scholarships. People do get them, you know. It is a crazy birther myth that Saudi princes financed Obama’s education. As far as I know Saudis finance only Saudi educations.

    The fact that Adobe automatically generates layers is well known, and the experts of Fox News and the National Review (a conservative magazine) have both stated that there was no forgery with Obama’s long-form birth certificate. The director of health of Hawaii stated in writing that she saw the original being copied and that the copy is authentic. Three Republican officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on Obama’s birth certificate.

    Moreover, there were notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961. And it turns out that the newspapers did not run birth notice ads in 1961, so these did not come from relatives. Where did they come from? They were only sent out by the Hawaii department of vital records, which did not send them out for births outside of Hawaii.

    Could the department have been fooled by relatives lying about Obama’s place of birth? No because when there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii required a witness statement, such as from the doctor or midwife.

    No congressional committee has investigated Obama’s SS number or the place of his birth. No congressional committee has ever investigated whether 1+1=2. There is a similarity in why there have not been investigations of such things.

    I am not saying that you should not dislike Obama. You have that right based on your feelings and your policies. But it is a lie to say that he was born outside of the USA and there is no evidence that he participated in getting the wrong SS numbers in his file.

    • You don’t seem to like questioning anything about Obama? And a question is not a lie. Questioning the fact he may or may not have been born in the USA, or that he may or may not have been using a phony SS number, or that he may or may not have said he was a Muslim on his application to University seems to be a natural response to his hiding the above information with millions in legal fees. Would you respond the same way to questions regarding George Bush? And I enjoyed your analogy that no Congressional committee has investigated whether 1+1=2, however it has little application to the fact none has investigated if the president of the United States has purposefully hidden his background from the American public. The majority of Congress seems to operate in a CYA mode rather than to serve the American people. The old addage, power corrupts….

  • tellerIP:

    Why hasn’t Sarah Palin shown her birth certificate? Question: Was she born in Canada?

    Why didn’t Romney show his parents’ marriage license? Question: Were they really married?

    Would I respond the same way with regard to questions regarding George Bush? I have repeatedly. To the questions whether he really won the election, I have replied many times that he DID win. (The AP did a count that proved it.)

    However, what is the point in posting, if the stuff that I post remains in moderation.

    The reason that no Congressional Committee has investigated whether or not Obama has hidden his background is because Obama hasn’t. There is no evidence that he hid anything, or at least, that there is no question that he hid anymore than Bush or any other President.

  • tellerIP:

    Re: “Millions in legal fees.”

    THAT was made up by birthers. There is no evidence for it. None at all.

  • tellerIP:

    The similarity of the CT and HI zip codes make it pretty obvious that a data entry error, either misreading the first digit or entering it wrong, lead to the generation of the CT social security number for Obama. There are also other numbers in his file, but there is no evidence that he used more than one of them.

    As for Obama being able to finance a very expensive education. Yes, that is done by academic scholarships. People do get them, you know. It is a crazy birther myth that Saudi princes financed Obama’s education. As far as I know Saudis finance only Saudi educations.

    The fact that Adobe automatically generates layers is well known, and the experts of Fox News and the National Review (a conservative magazine) have both stated that there was no forgery with Obama’s long-form birth certificate. The director of health of Hawaii stated in writing that she saw the original being copied and that the copy is authentic. Three Republican officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on Obama’s birth certificate.

    Moreover, there were notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961. And it turns out that the newspapers did not run birth notice ads in 1961, so these did not come from relatives. Where did they come from? They were only sent out by the Hawaii department of vital records, which did not send them out for births outside of Hawaii.

    Could the department have been fooled by relatives lying about Obama’s place of birth? No because when there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii required a witness statement, such as from the doctor or midwife.

    No congressional committee has investigated Obama’s SS number or the place of his birth. No congressional committee has ever investigated whether 1+1=2. There is a similarity in why there have not been investigations of such things.

    I am not saying that you should not dislike Obama. You have that right based on your feelings and your policies. But it is a lie to say that he was born outside of the USA and there is no evidence that he participated in getting the wrong SS numbers in his file.

  • If you’re interested in Kagan’s defense of Obama on the birth certificate issue, and this is not from a “birther” source, unless you consider the Supreme Court a “birther” bunch, check these sources:

    Supreme Court Justice Elana Kagan was the Solicitor General for Obama to show proof of natural born citizenship

    by The Party Of No on April 1, 2011

    Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket:You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!!Check out these examples:
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm
    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

  • Why hasn’t Sarah Palin shown her birth certificate? Question: Was she born in Canada?

    If anyone had asked to see Palin’s birth certificate, there’s no quetion in my mind she would have shrugged and shown it, and done so within a few days at most, not two and a half years later.

    Why didn’t Romney show his parents’ marriage license? Question: Were they really married?

    Had anyone asked to see Romney’s parent’s marriage license, he would have shrugged and shown it. Obama hasn’t shrugged and shown anything in question other than a birth certificate that thousands have said is fake, and that I tore apart in Photoshop in minutes after it (whatever it was) became public.

    Would I respond the same way with regard to questions regarding George Bush? I have repeatedly. To the questions whether he really won the election, I have replied many times that he DID win. (The AP did a count that proved it.)

    You trust the AP far more than I.

    However, what is the point in posting, if the stuff that I post remains in moderation.

    That you’ll have to explain to me?

    The reason that no Congressional Committee has investigated whether or not Obama has hidden his background is because Obama hasn’t. There is no evidence that he hid anything, or at least, that there is no question that he hid anymore than Bush or any other President.

    You also have far more faith in Congress than do I. The evidence that he’s hidden so very, very much is that he hasn’t shown it. Duh!

  • tellerIP:

    Re Palin and Romney showing their documents. Sure they will. Sure.

    I’ll be filing suit for their birth certificates, college records, kindergarten records and parent’s marriage licenses in about six months. See what they do. I’ll bet that they do just what Obama did. One reason is that I do not really have a right to see those documents. You trust them to give the documents. I think that they would be just the same as Obama. We’ll see. In any case, there is no legal right to see a candidate’s college transcript, passport, parents’ marriage license, Etc.

    Are you saying that George Bush did not win the election? You asked whether I would defend George Bush by citing the facts. I said that I DID. I am also citing the facts about Obama. He was born in Hawaii, and he did not have his long-form birth certificate forged. The director of health of Hawaii has certified in writing that she saw the long-form birth certificate being copied and that the copy is accurate.

    It is well-known that Adobe creates layers. That is normal. Here is an image of the birth certificate that was done by a photocopy, NOT by using Adobe:

    http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/BirthCertificateHighResolution.jpg

    And: Here is the autobiography of the guy who filed the claim that Obama’s birth certificate was forged:

    http://www.vectorpub.com/Reality_Revealed.html

    More than two years ago Obama showed a copy of the Certification of Live Birth, which is the official birth certificate of Hawaii. That was, and still is, the correct one to show, since it is the official birth certificate and the one that Hawaii sent to Obama in 2007. Birthers claimed that the image of that one was forged too. However, three Republican officials in Hawaii have confirmed that the facts on it were accurate.

    Obama has not hidden any more than any other president or candidate did. That is why the US Congress is not investigating.

  • tellerIP:

    Re: Kagan.

    You probably know that the US Supreme Court turned down every single birther lawsuit. You should also know that this was before Kagan was on the court. She did not participate in any discussions over whether or not to take any birther cases since she was appointed since there have not been any birther cases in that period.

    Moreover, the US Supreme Court did not ask Obama to file a response to any birther cases. It only takes one justice to ask a side to respond to the briefs of the other side, but in the birther cases not one justice asked for a response.

    What this means, duh, is that Kagan did not do any work on any birther lawsuits. There was no work to do. Yes, she was the attorney representing Obama, and her job was to represent him in every case brought against him. BUT, no birther case was called by the court, and the court did not ask for a response, so there was no work to do. The cases that you cite are not birther cases.

  • tellerIP:

    Regarding the allegation that Palin and Romney will show their documents. Sure they will. Sure.

    I’ll be filing suit for their birth certificates, college records, kindergarten records and parent’s marriage licenses in about six months. See what they do. I’ll bet that they do just what Obama did. One reason is that I do not really have a right to see those documents. You trust them to give the documents. I think that they would be just the same as Obama. We’ll see. In any case, there is no legal right to see a candidate’s college transcript, passport, parents’ marriage license, Etc.

    Are you saying that George Bush did not win the election? You asked whether I would defend George Bush by citing the facts. I said that I DID. I am also citing the facts about Obama. He was born in Hawaii, and he did not have his long-form birth certificate forged. The director of health of Hawaii has certified in writing that she saw the long-form birth certificate being copied and that the copy is accurate.

    It is well-known that Adobe creates layers. That is normal. Here is an image of the birth certificate that was done by a photocopy, NOT by using Adobe:

    http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/BirthCertificateHighResolution.jpg

    And: Here is the autobiography of the guy who filed the claim that Obama’s birth certificate was forged:

    http://www.vectorpub.com/Reality_Revealed.html

    More than two years ago Obama showed a copy of the Certification of Live Birth, which is the official birth certificate of Hawaii. That was, and still is, the correct one to show, since it is the official birth certificate and the one that Hawaii sent to Obama in 2007. Birthers claimed that the image of that one was forged too. However, three Republican officials in Hawaii have confirmed that the facts on it were accurate.

    Obama has not hidden any more than any other president or candidate did. That is why the US Congress is not investigating.

  • tellerIP:

    Re Palin and Romney showing their documents. Sure they will. Sure.

    I’ll be filing suit for their birth certificates, college records, kindergarten records and parent’s marriage licenses in about six months. See what they do. I’ll bet that they do just what Obama did. One reason is that I do not really have a right to see those documents. You trust them to give the documents. I think that they would be just the same as Obama. We’ll see. In any case, there is no legal right to see a candidate’s college transcript, passport, parents’ marriage license, Etc.

    Are you saying that George Bush did not win the election? You asked whether I would defend George Bush by citing the facts. I said that I DID. I am also citing the facts about Obama. He was born in Hawaii, and he did not have his long-form birth certificate forged. The director of health of Hawaii has certified in writing that she saw the long-form birth certificate being copied and that the copy is accurate.

    It is well-known that Adobe creates layers. That is normal.

    More than two years ago Obama showed a copy of the Certification of Live Birth, which is the official birth certificate of Hawaii. That was, and still is, the correct one to show, since it is the official birth certificate and the one that Hawaii sent to Obama in 2007. Birthers claimed that the image of that one was forged too. However, three Republican officials in Hawaii have confirmed that the facts on it were accurate.

    Obama has not hidden any more than any other president or candidate did. That is why the US Congress is not investigating.

  • “I’ll be filing suit for their birth certificates, college records, kindergarten records and parent’s marriage licenses in about six months. See what they do. I’ll bet that they do just what Obama did. One reason is that I do not really have a right to see those documents. You trust them to give the documents. I think that they would be just the same as Obama. We’ll see. In any case, there is no legal right to see a candidate’s college transcript, passport, parents’ marriage license, Etc.”

    The point is, why don’t you just ask? Any reasonable public official would merely provide same. THAT’S THE POINT. And yes, I’m shouting. And, by the way, you’re attempting to slay the messenger, as you can see by the original post, I said, “came to me on the web.” Do you fear this stuff flying all over the web? Maybe you’d like to support the proposed bill to make sharing videos on the web a felony? Myself, I kind of like freedom of speech, and enjoy throwing it on the wall and seeing what sticks. Libs talk the talk but don’t walk the walk.

    • tellerIP:

      And, why didn’t you just ask for Obama’s transcripts, Etc? Did you? Did WND? Did Palin? Did anyone?

      If they had asked for his birth certificate, he would have provided it. In fact, he did provide it. If they asked for his transcript, he MIGHT have provided it. It is his right to make that decision, as it is with Sarah Palin. Would she have provided it if asked nicely? Maybe, maybe not. IF I sued her for her transcript, would she defend the lawsuit? Maybe.

      The point, however, is that she is not hiding anything, and neither is Obama. If there were a law that said that he had to release his transcripts and he didn’t that would be hiding. If other presidents had released them, and he didn’t, that would be hiding. But Obama hasn’t done anything that other presidents did not do, and there is no evidence that he was asked for his transcripts, his parents’ marriage license etc. nicely.

      Re: “Came to me on the Web.”

      You did repost it. It is an allegation without any truth behind it, as the CT and HI zip code examples show. By the way, I am not trying to slay the messenger, just to demolish the message.

      Re bill to make sharing videos a felony. No.

  • tellerIP:

    Re: “When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property .”

    Agreed. But while inspiring, that statement is truly vague. It does not say: “Public officials should release their records,” and you notice that most do not release them. Apparently only presidential and vice presidential candidates release their tax records, and you notice that no Republican presidential candidates have even released those yet. (Obama has released them.)

    No president has ever released his college transcripts. Maybe they should have, but they didn’t. The same with their parents marriage licenses, their passports, etc.

    • tellerIP:

      No, it doesn’t say that at all, and Thomas Jefferson never went around telling people that he had a black mistress. Obama has not released his school records. Neither did Bush, and Romney has not so far (However, the chance of his releasing his high school, middle school and kindergarten records is absurdly low).

      There is no law that says that such records should be released, and no president or presidential candidates have released them. Teddy Roosevelt, one of the four up there on Mt. Rushmore, did not release his grades, nor did Woodrow Wilson, FDR or Ronald Reagan. No president has released what some birthers are asking for, their parents’ marriage licenses, and no president has shown his passport.

      ONE president has published his birth certificate (Eisenhower had his placed available to be looked at an election commission), and that is Obama. And THREE Republican officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on that birth certificate.

Leave a Reply