Population Trends Don’t Bode Well For The Republic….

But if you dig deeper into the statistics of the election, including within the states…

Number of  States won by: Obama: 19 McCain:  29

Square miles  of land won by: Obama: 580,000  McCain:  2,427,000

Population  of counties won by: Obama: 127 million  McCain: 143  million

Murder rate  per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2  McCain: 2.1

Population, as illustrated in the article below, is consolidating in our cities.

This is a trend that does not bode well for America and the republic.  If you look at the demographics of the Obama election, it was the city that elected him, the non-tax-paying hand-out, palm-up sector who decries self-reliance, free enterprise, not to speak of clean air, water, and a love for the land.

Our forefathers knew when they established our republic that cities were by their very nature decadent.  When they established two houses in Congress, it was not following the English “House of Lords” and “House of Commons,” it was establishing an all new system of one man one vote in the House of Representatives and one state (no matter it’s population) two votes in the Senate…otherwise a state, no matter how rural it might be, has the same power in the Senate as does the urbanized State of New York, California, or Florida.  Wyoming with a half million population yields the same power as does California with thirty five million.

However, that power doesn’t necessarily carry over into presidential elections, as you can see by the illustration above.  I don’t think the forefathers could possibly foresee a time when one state had a population 70 times that of another.

This from delanceyplace.com:

Population, as illustrated in the article below, is consolidating in our cities.

This is a trend that does not bode well for America and the republic.  If you look at the demographics of the Obama election, it was the city that elected him, the non-tax-paying hand-out, palm-up sector who decries self-reliance, free enterprise, not to speak of clean air, water, and a love for the land.

Our forefathers knew when they established our republic that cities were by their very nature decadent.  When they established two houses in Congress, it was not following the English “House of Lords” and “House of Commons,” it was establishing an all new system of one man one vote in the House of Representatives and one state (no matter it’s population) two votes in the Senate…otherwise a state, no matter how rural it might be, has the same power in the Senate as does the urbanized State of New York, California, or Florida.  Wyoming with a half million population yields the same power as does California with thirty five million.

However, that power doesn’t necessarily carry over into presidential elections, as you can see by the illustration above.  I don’t think the forefathers could possibly foresee a time when one state had a population 70 times that of another.

This from delanceyplace.com:

In today’s excerpt – in 2007, the urban population of the world surpassed the rural population for the first time, due to both the increased mechanization of agriculture and the economic and social lure of the city. It had happened in the U.S. in the late 1910′s. Now, two hundred forty-three million Americans crowd together in the 3 percent of the country that is urban, and the other 97 percent of the land in the country houses the remaining sixty million. And China’s urban population is expected to surpass its rural population in 2015. The city has triumphed:

“Two hundred forty-three million Americans crowd together in the 3 percent of the country that is urban. Thirty-six million people live in and around Tokyo, the most productive metropolitan area in the world. Twelve million people reside in central Mumbai, and Shanghai is almost as large. On a planet with vast amounts of space (all of humanity could fit in Texas – each of us with a personal townhouse), we choose cities. Although it has become cheaper to travel long distances, or to telecommute from the Ozarks to Azerbaijan, more and more people are clustering closer and closer together in large metropolitan areas. Five million more people every month live in the cities of the developing world, and in 2011, more than half the world’s population is urban.

Cities, the dense agglomerations that dot the globe, have been engines of innovation since Plato and Socrates bickered in an Athenian marketplace. The streets of Florence gave us the Renaissance, and the streets of Birmingham gave us the Industrial Revolution. The great prosperity of contemporary London and Bangalore and Tokyo comes from their ability to produce new thinking. Wandering these cities – whether down cobblestone sidewalks or grid-cutting cross streets, around roundabouts or under freeways – is to study nothing less than human progress.

“In the richer countries of the West, cities have survived the tumultuous end of the industrial age and are now wealthier, healthier, and more alluring than ever. In the world’s poorer places, cities are expanding enormously because urban density provides the clearest path from poverty to prosperity. Despite the technological breakthroughs that have caused the death of distance, it turns out that the world isn’t flat; it’s paved.

“The city has triumphed. But as many of us know from personal experience, sometimes city roads are paved to hell. The city may win, but too often its citizens seem to lose. Every urban childhood is shaped by an onrush of extraordinary people and experiences – some delicious, like the sense of power that comes from a preteen’s first subway trip alone; some less so, like a first exposure to urban gunfire. For every Fifth Avenue, there’s a Mumbai slum; for every Sorbonne, there’s a D.C. high school guarded by metal detectors.

“Indeed, for many Americans, the latter half of the twentieth century – the end of the industrial age – was an education not in urban splendor but in urban squalor. How well we learn from the lessons our cities teach us will determine whether our urban species will flourish in what can be a new golden age of the city.”

Author: Edward Glaeser

Title: Triumph of the City

Publisher: Penguin

Pate: Copyright 2011 by Edward Glaeser

Pages: 1-2

End of Article

“The Golden Age of The City”…not to my way of thinking.  For all the allure of New York City and Beverly Hills and San Francisco and Seattle…they’re a nice place to visit, but give me clean air, clean water, quiet, and self-reliant folks of the rural areas any time.

Leave a Reply